MONEY MATTERS, ETC.

May 2009

Investing in the Stock Market

By Otto Frank

It was obvious shortly after retiring that pension and Social Security payments were inadequate for maintaining an adequate lifestyle.
It became necessary to acquaint myself with the workings of the stock market to develop an additional source of income.
After reading a multitude of financial tracts, It seems that it doesn’t seem to matter much what instruments one invests in; over the long haul results will not differ greatly.
Sheer luck or gross stupidity are the principal reasons for results deviating appreciably from major indices.

This raises the obvious question:  Is it possible to out-index the S&P 500?
The writer notes-- Referring to a recent FORBES article on Index Funds (April 27, 2009) --that a number of equity specialists have claimed that a value tilted index fund
(using secret formulations of revenue, cash flow, dividends and book value) will beat a plain index fund.
Such programs have been licensed to a number of well known brokerage firms, but in the less than five year they have been in existents these so-called “fundamental research funds”
have not demonstrated that they can outperform a vanilla index fund based on the benchmark S&P 500.
As a matter of fact, for the few years they have done considerably worse.

In the same magazine, another columnist pretty well summarizes investor fallacies which have made professional stock pickers rich and the individual stock picker poor.

  1. “Send us some money and we will share with you a foolproof system for beating the market “(why give a good system away?).
  2. The Heisenberg Unpleasantness Principle: Observing a market pattern makes it stop. Market-beating recipes don’t last.
    As soon as a pattern gets noticed, the general public will equalize the outcome.
  3. It has been argued that value stocks will beat growth stocks (Total returns) since most investors are basically conservative. So sell Google and buy Gannett.
  4. When the famous market-beating impulse formula made famous by VALUE LINE was put to the test
    by a fund based on this system, the outcome relative to the indices was disappointing.
  5. There have been very few funds which have consistently beaten the markets, and those only by a very small margin (with a great deal of computational effort).

Can we do any better creating our own fund by buying individual bonds and stocks, than a commercial fund which is indexed against the S&P 500, or any of the other indices?
There are certainly enough readily accessible resources available to permit such an effort. But how reliable or useful is this plethora of available information?
The Answer:  Not very much since most of such information is either confusing, or outdated.
Look at the variation of ratings by research organizations of two companies picked at random.



<
Variation of Ratings by Research Organizations
OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM (OXY) COSTCO (COST)
Research Org. Rating Research Org. Rating
Ativo Research outperform Thomson Financial hold
Bank of America under-perform Zacks hold
Ford hold Ford hold
Standard & Poor hold Channel Trends outperform
Market Edge buy Standard & Poor hold
Thomas White hold Columbine under-perform
Columbine outperform Market Edge buy
Ativo Research sell

Looking at more detailed analyses, such as are provided by financial research organization or investment guides, the picture becomes no clearer.
The evaluations by Ativo Research of the above two companies provides only a minimally improved understanding of how they arrived at their recommendations.



Evalutions by Ativo Research

Company OXY COST
Recommendation "Buy" "Sell"
Expected Shareholder Rtn Most Favorable Average
PE to Expected Growth Ratio Most Favorable Average
Price Momentum Average Average
Qualitative Analysis Average Average
Sales Growth Unfavorable Average
Earnings Surprise Favorable Average
ROI Trend Average Average


The information and interpretation you receive via normal channels (e.g. publications or the internet), are already outdated by the time they are received.
To be in possession of the latest information requires a constant face to face contact with your computer,
telephone communication with people intimately involved in a targeted industry, or (illegal) insider information.
And then, maybe, you could have a tiny edge (or not).

So, Let me restate my earlier conclusion. If you are a neophyte investor, or don’t want (or have the time) to do the heavy lifting required to assemble a personal investment fund,
purchase a low expense index fund directly from the issuing company.
And stay away from investment clubs.

For those who are willing to keep up with key industries on a full time basis, it is generally recommended that they buy at least 30 different, well diversified companies to make up their personal fund.
That will give them the assurance that the performance of their fund will at least stay within an acceptable range of the S&P 500 index.

To help improve on such results, I have assembled the stock of several companies that are expected to beat the Dow by at least 7 %.
(Note that 87.4% of all statistics are made up on the spot).



Some Stocks To Consider

Company Industry
Chevron (CVX) Petroleum
Encana (ECA) Natural Gas
Sanofi-Aventis (SNY) Drugs
Diageo (DEO) Liquor
Paychex (PAYX) Check Cashing
Ormat (ORA) Geothermal Energy
International Paper (IP) Paper Products
Mettler-Toledo (MTD) Scales
Nestle (NSRGY) Consumer Staples
Exelon (EXC) Electricity
Spectra (SE) Pipelines
National Retail Properties (NNN) Real Estate


GOOD LUCK !


Editor's Note: This article was prepared by H/AREA Member Otto Frank who is expressing his Personal Views on Investing in the Stock Market.


Disclaimer:
It should be noted that H/AREA makes this information known as a Service to its Home Page Viewers.
H/AREA does not recommend or endorse any of these Stocks listed in this article.
H/AREA has no financial interest and has no business relationship with any of the Research Firms listed in this article.


March 2009

With our economic picture being so bleak, volatile and unpredictable, I hesitate to write about it, knowing this won’t appear in print for another month. Nevertheless, despite my lack of credentials, I will continue to offer my commentaries as they can’t be any worse than the analysis and advice given us by the financial gurus prior to the beginning of the downturn starting in 2008. In assessing where our country (and each one of us) stands with respect to the economy, it is important to distinguish between the federal deficit and the national debt. The federal deficit is how much deeper we go into debt each year as reflected in the annual Federal Budget. The national debt is the grand total of all of our annual deficits and it is the amount upon which the U.S. pays interest each year. The interest is a significant and growing part of our annual budget. I had trouble reconciling some of the numbers from the Congressional Budget Office with those from the White House Office of Management and Budget (see The Star Ledger, Feb. 27, page 2) but in round numbers I concluded that the Obama administration’s forecast is as follows: From 2009 to 2012 the Federal deficit will be cut in half and the National debt will be almost doubled The foregoing sentence should be read again and noted. I have seen that currently each individual’s share of the national debt is anywhere from $35,000 to $50,000, depending upon where I read it. I applaud Obama for taking decisive action by challenging the congress to address these horrendous numbers and to face the upcoming Social Security and Medicare collapse as well. It’s comical that the Republicans face a moral dilemma in this situation. Whereas the Democrats hope that the Obama Stimulus Package is a great success, the Republicans hope the country recovers from the economic downturn, but if it does, they don’t want the stimulus package to get credit for it. If the recovery goes awry, both the administration and the approach will change and the shoe will be on the other foot and it will become a case of less government instead of more government. For decades our congress has tuned a blind eye to the national debt. It seems to me that sooner or later the U.S. will max out its credit card when China and others will refuse to lend us any more money. That will happen when our creditors’ fear, that the U.S. has become a sub-prime borrower, will exceed their concerns about losing the largest market for their goods. The national debt is a classic bubble in which all of us are involved and we will have to pay the piper sooner or later. Unfortunately, I don’t believe that career politicians who wish to stay in office will ever take the necessary steps to even start paying down the national debt. So, instead of incurring more pain now, the bubble will burst some day. I would love to receive constructive comments about this from our readers. No partisan finger pointing, please. We may or may not print it.

Lew Bohn

LewBohn@optonline.net
AREA CONTACT POINT
Honeywell/AlliedSignal Retired Employees Association
P.O. Box 2245
Morristown, NJ 07962-2245
Fax (973) 455-3632


January 2009

Lew Bohn

LewBohn@optonline.net


November 2008

Lew Bohn


September 2008

Lew Bohn


June 2008

For your info, here is a summary of candidates’ positions on taxes

Lew Bohn


March 2008

Lew Bohn


January 2008

Lew Bohn

LewBohn@optonline.net


November 2007

LewBohn
lewbohn@optonline.net


September 2007

LewBohn
lewbohn@optonline.net


June 2007

LewBohn
lewbohn@optonline.net


April 2007